2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple fabrication of (CoFe)Se2 @NC electrode materials derived from MOF materials and the electrochemical properties for supercapacitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure f depicts the GCD curves of the device at different current densities, showing a high specific capacity of 80.3 F g –1 at a current density of 1 A g –1 . Figure g shows the relationship between the energy density and power density of the ASC device (25.3 Wh kg –1 at 750 W kg –1 ) and compares it with other reported selenide ASC devices, such as CoSe//AC (17.6 Wh kg –1 at 684 W kg –1 ), CoSe 2 //AC (18.9 Wh kg –1 at 387 W kg –1 and 9.34 Wh kg –1 at 7750 W kg –1 ), CoSe 2 @NiSe 2 //AC (20.1 Wh kg –1 at 798 W kg –1 ), (CoFe)­Se 2 @NC//Fe 2 O 3 /RGO (20 Wh kg –1 at 750 W kg –1 and 13.1 Wh kg –1 at 7500 W kg –1 ), Ni 0.85 Se//graphene (17.8 Wh kg –1 at 810 W kg –1 ), NiSe@MoSe 2 //graphene (25.5 Wh kg –1 at 420 W kg –1 ), and so on.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure f depicts the GCD curves of the device at different current densities, showing a high specific capacity of 80.3 F g –1 at a current density of 1 A g –1 . Figure g shows the relationship between the energy density and power density of the ASC device (25.3 Wh kg –1 at 750 W kg –1 ) and compares it with other reported selenide ASC devices, such as CoSe//AC (17.6 Wh kg –1 at 684 W kg –1 ), CoSe 2 //AC (18.9 Wh kg –1 at 387 W kg –1 and 9.34 Wh kg –1 at 7750 W kg –1 ), CoSe 2 @NiSe 2 //AC (20.1 Wh kg –1 at 798 W kg –1 ), (CoFe)­Se 2 @NC//Fe 2 O 3 /RGO (20 Wh kg –1 at 750 W kg –1 and 13.1 Wh kg –1 at 7500 W kg –1 ), Ni 0.85 Se//graphene (17.8 Wh kg –1 at 810 W kg –1 ), NiSe@MoSe 2 //graphene (25.5 Wh kg –1 at 420 W kg –1 ), and so on.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These values are significantly higher than those of similar electrode materials shown in the comparative electrochemical performance chart (Table S2). , Figure S6a shows the SEM image of ZnSe–SnSe 2 after cyclic testing, revealing that ZnSe–SnSe 2 , PVDF, and conductive carbon black are uniformly distributed onto the nickel foam. A comparative analysis of the SEM images taken before cycling indicates that the original microcubes experience significant aggregation and pulverization during prolonged charge–discharge cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exhaustion of nonrenewable energy sources worldwide and the growing problem of pollution, active efforts are being made to develop green and sustainable energy storage devices in recent years. Compared with traditional capacitors and secondary batteries, supercapacitors have the combined advantages of large electric capacity, high power density, and superhigh charge retention capacity, which are widely used in new energy, electronic communication, aerospace, and other fields. Although much progress has been achieved in the designing and manufacturing of electrode materials, the supercapacitors with higher energy density still attract a lot of attention. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%