2018
DOI: 10.4310/acta.2018.v220.n2.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple homotopy equivalence of nearby Lagrangians

Abstract: Given a closed exact Lagrangian in the cotangent bundle of a closed smooth manifold, we prove that the projection to the base is a simple homotopy equivalence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have seen in §5, Arnol'd's nearby Lagrangian conjecture holds for Q = S 1 , and it is known also for Q = S 2 by a result of R. Hind [101]. For all other manifolds Q, the strongest result known so far is the following recent theorem due to Abouzaid and Kragh [9]. Theorem 7.3.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As we have seen in §5, Arnol'd's nearby Lagrangian conjecture holds for Q = S 1 , and it is known also for Q = S 2 by a result of R. Hind [101]. For all other manifolds Q, the strongest result known so far is the following recent theorem due to Abouzaid and Kragh [9]. Theorem 7.3.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Floer-theoretic Wh 1 invariant was used by Abouzaid and Kragh in [AK18] to prove that the projection to the base of any nearby Lagrangian in a cotangent bundle is a simple homotopy equivalence. Another application was found by Suárez [Suá17] in her study of exact Lagrangian cobordisms.…”
Section: Appendix Overview Of Torsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The famous "nearby Lagrangian problem" asks whether there is a unique up to Hamiltonian isotopy exact closed Lagrangian submanifold in the standard T * M for a closed M . Though in this form the answer is unknown except for M = S 2 and T 2 , see [27,12], the answer is positive up to simple homotopy equivalence, [1], and hence according to Smale, Freedman and Perelman for M = S n up to homeomorphism, and for some dimensions, e.g. n = 3, 5, 6, 12, even up to diffeomorphism, [34].…”
Section: Symplectic Topology Of Weinstein Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem 6.3. Can the uniquenes results from [1] be extended to a more general class of Weinstein structures on T * S n ?…”
Section: Symplectic Topology Of Weinstein Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%