1992
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1992.0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple mathematical models for urban growth

Abstract: A simple deterministic mathematical model for urban growth and spread is developed in which there is local logistic growth, diffusion, and an integral (‘killing’) term representing the inhibitory effect of congested central areas on growth. Migration is represented by boundary conditions. The resulting integrodifferential equation has steady-state solutions which satisfy a third-order nonlinear differential equation and are obtained numerically. Time-dependent solutions are obtained by using a modified Crank–N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban areas grow around their edges primarily due the demand for new space which is translated through the usual process into new development’. Similarly, Bracken & Tuckwell [ 52 ] proposed a simple deterministic mathematical model for urban growth considering ‘local logistic growth, diffusion and an integral (killing) term representing the inhibitory effect of congested central areas on growth’. Yet this assumption is purely theoretical as, strictly speaking, there is no clear evidence that the ‘diffusion’ of urbanization is the result of random walks and mixing of population (e.g.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban areas grow around their edges primarily due the demand for new space which is translated through the usual process into new development’. Similarly, Bracken & Tuckwell [ 52 ] proposed a simple deterministic mathematical model for urban growth considering ‘local logistic growth, diffusion and an integral (killing) term representing the inhibitory effect of congested central areas on growth’. Yet this assumption is purely theoretical as, strictly speaking, there is no clear evidence that the ‘diffusion’ of urbanization is the result of random walks and mixing of population (e.g.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies try to understand this urban growth [7]. Others create simple mathematical models [8,9]. Meanwhile, using and developing logistic regression has grown in recent years [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a long tradition in urban and regional science to approach the mathematical modelling of urban processes in the spirit of classical mathematical physics, by developing various deterministic (sometimes, quite sophisticated) models, aiming to capture the multi-component, dynamically variable nature of cities by augmenting the equations with suitable feedback mechanisms, akin to reaction-diffusion models or predator-prey models (see, e.g., Wilson 1981;Bracken & Tuckwell 1992, and further references therein). Although often useful in practical terms, the efficiency of such models proved to be limited to short spatio-temporal scales, hence there was the growing understanding among both theorists and practitioners that the deterministic approach was conceptually flawed, as it was missing some intrinsic, significant features of cities as agglomerates with formidably complex structure and intricate dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%