2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.08.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple method of vocal cord lateralization in bilateral abductor cord paralysis in paediatric patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, all 10 children treated with this method were subsequently decannulated. 7 There is only one report of the use of this technique to manage paradoxical vocal fold movement, leading to successful decannulation, although in that case unilateral lateralisation was performed. 8 Our case suggests that suture lateralisation may be an important, novel treatment to enable decannulation of patients with treatment-resistant paradoxical vocal fold movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, all 10 children treated with this method were subsequently decannulated. 7 There is only one report of the use of this technique to manage paradoxical vocal fold movement, leading to successful decannulation, although in that case unilateral lateralisation was performed. 8 Our case suggests that suture lateralisation may be an important, novel treatment to enable decannulation of patients with treatment-resistant paradoxical vocal fold movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a simple technique with no intralaryngeal manipulation. This novel and simple technique has been designed and described previously by the senior author for vocal cord lateralisation as technique 2 [17] . The child was extubated on the fourth post operative day.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen articles had flaws that disqualified them from inclusion (sampling, diagnostic definition, incomplete follow up, and non-objective assessment of final outcome) [2,4,[6][7][8]14,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. Twenty-one articles were assessing glottic expansion procedures on highly selected groups [9,[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96]. Three articles were studying a certain diagnostic modality [97][98][99].…”
Section: Electronic Search and Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohen [79] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 5 Ezzat et al [80] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 6 Friedman et al [81] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 7 Craig et al [82] Studying surgical technique 8 Hartnick et al [83] Comparing different surgical glottic expansion techniques 9 Inglis et al [84] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 10 Lagier et al [85] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 11 Lidia et al [86] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 12 Mathur et al [87] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 13 Narcy [88] Studying the efficacy of a specific surgical technique 14 Woodman and Pennington [89] Discussing a surgical technique 15…”
Section: No Studymentioning
confidence: 99%