1964
DOI: 10.1038/sc.1964.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple methods of examination in paraplegia: I. the spoon test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the non- painful tactile phantoms, 4 were evoked by contact in RZ (2͞12 subjects, 16%). This incidence of tactile RPS is in agreement with the only prior study (to our knowledge) that has examined tactile RPS after SCI (34), which reported RPS in 12% of SCI subjects.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the non- painful tactile phantoms, 4 were evoked by contact in RZ (2͞12 subjects, 16%). This incidence of tactile RPS is in agreement with the only prior study (to our knowledge) that has examined tactile RPS after SCI (34), which reported RPS in 12% of SCI subjects.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a pattern analogous to the RPS evoked by tactile contact in Subject 1, Bors (34) observed RZ on the chest with RPS in the upper leg or sacral region in three of six SCI subjects with RZ. Similarly, in a subject with T8-level complete SCI, electrical stimulation of regions of the ventral thalamus that had receptive fields on the chest evoked sensations in the upper thigh region (57).…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Perceptual and Cortical Reorganization Amentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The spoon test qualitatively evaluates the smoothness with which the convex side of a spoon slides over moist skin. It does not require any pharmacological stimulation of the sweat glands and is extremely easy-to-perform [58]. Its major limitation is the lack of quantitative assessment as the results depend on the investigator's perception of the spoon sliding.…”
Section: Non-axon-reflex-based Sudomotor Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%