“…In the totality of the interactions exceeding dispersion (Figure 4), there is no evidence for nucleophile addition to C-atoms adjacent to N, so it can be said at this point that M(II) cations seem to be distinguishable from M(V) and M(VI) cations in this respect. Interactions of the cations with the counteranions and lattice solvents occur along with aromatic-aromatic interactions, and even in only the eight cases considered, there are variations in both the coun- The vast majority of the structural studies of complexes of 2,2 :6 ,2 -terpyridine and its derivatives concern metal(II) and metal(III) species, and the present work largely complements such investigations, which range, for Co(II), for example, from early determinations on a single compound for which H-atom coordinates are not available, e.g., [65], to those of several complexes of various derivatives with full coordinates, e.g., [66], such variations reflecting, in part, major advances in the ease of the synthesis of the ligands [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and in crystallographic equipment. The complexes 2-6 of the tptpy ligand add Fe(II), Ni(II) and Ru(II) to the series, with Co(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II) studied earlier [34,37], and form part of a rather large family of structurally characterised complexes of 4 derivatives of 2,2 :6 ,2 -terpyridine, where the substituent is an apolar aromatic unit.…”