1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-34892-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple On-the-fly Automatic Verification of Linear Temporal Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
488
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(491 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
488
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A construction of an automaton for an LTL formula was first proposed by Wolper, Vardi, and Sistla [24]. This basic construction has been improved in several papers ( [12,21,9]) where various heuristics have been used to produce automaton as small and as "weak" as possible. Although these heuristics are quite sophisticated, they do not provide any insight into the relation between the formula and the "weakness" of the resulting automaton.…”
Section: Theorem 4 a Property T Specifiable By Automata Is A Guarantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A construction of an automaton for an LTL formula was first proposed by Wolper, Vardi, and Sistla [24]. This basic construction has been improved in several papers ( [12,21,9]) where various heuristics have been used to produce automaton as small and as "weak" as possible. Although these heuristics are quite sophisticated, they do not provide any insight into the relation between the formula and the "weakness" of the resulting automaton.…”
Section: Theorem 4 a Property T Specifiable By Automata Is A Guarantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erigone is a single program consisting of several subsystems: (1) a top-down compiler that translates Promela into transitions with a JVM-like byte code for the statements and expressions; (2) a model checker that implements the algorithms as described in [7], except that an explicit stack for pending transitions from the states is used instead of recursion; (3) a translator of LTL to BA using the algorithm in [8].…”
Section: The Implementation Of Erigonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In searching for a counter example, a negative occurrence of some [q] Note that this optimization relies on a construction that does not force every state of the property automaton A ¬ϕ to have each snapshot formula either negated or non-negated (i.e., a construction in the style of [3] rather than as in [11] needs to be used). This trick allows to enumerate the satisfying truth assignments of the different such positive subformulas separately.…”
Section: Optimization For Negative Snapshotsmentioning
confidence: 99%