1991
DOI: 10.1021/ie00056a028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple PI and PID tuning for open-loop unstable systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 presents a stability robustness comparison with other existing PID tuning methods. In particular, the tuning methods presented in Sections 4 and 5 are compared with the R&L method with λ=2.2 (Rotstein & Lewin, 1991), the P&M method (De Paor and O'Malley, 1989), the H&X method with specifications A m =1.3 and φ m =10 o (Ho & Xu, 1998), the P&P method based on the ITAE criterion (Poulin & Pomerleau, 1997) and the J&C method based on the IMC tuning rule with λ=2.5 (Jacob & Chidambaram, 1996), in the special case where d=0.5 and τ S =1. Table 5 show that the DPC method provides more robust controllers than most other methods (except the J&C method with λ=2.5, that gives a significantly slower response in both set point tracking and regulatory control).…”
Section: Controller Tuning Based On Closed-loop Time-response Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 presents a stability robustness comparison with other existing PID tuning methods. In particular, the tuning methods presented in Sections 4 and 5 are compared with the R&L method with λ=2.2 (Rotstein & Lewin, 1991), the P&M method (De Paor and O'Malley, 1989), the H&X method with specifications A m =1.3 and φ m =10 o (Ho & Xu, 1998), the P&P method based on the ITAE criterion (Poulin & Pomerleau, 1997) and the J&C method based on the IMC tuning rule with λ=2.5 (Jacob & Chidambaram, 1996), in the special case where d=0.5 and τ S =1. Table 5 show that the DPC method provides more robust controllers than most other methods (except the J&C method with λ=2.5, that gives a significantly slower response in both set point tracking and regulatory control).…”
Section: Controller Tuning Based On Closed-loop Time-response Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,6] proposed an IMCbased PID tuning rules for open-loop unstable process models without time delay, whilst [7] introduced a similar tuning method for delayed unstable process. [8] developed a graphical tuning method for integrating and unstable processes with time delay based on the analysis of the open-loop frequency response of the process on the Nichols chart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However robustness studies of the controlled system for the perturbations in time delay, time constant and gain are not reported. Rotstein and Lewin (1991) have proposed a method for designing PI/PIO controllers based on IMC methods. The method first neglects the ·Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%