2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Serum Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Protein Biomarkers—Is There Anything in Sight?

Abstract: A poor PDAC prognosis is due to a lack of effective treatment and late diagnosis. The early detection of PDAC could significantly decrease mortality and save lives. Idealbiomarkers for PDAC should be cost-effective, detectable in easily accessible biological material, and present in sufficient concentration in the earliest possible phase of the disease. This review addresses newly selected, simple protein biomarkers—new ones such as thrombospondin-2, insulin-linked binding protein 2, lysophosphatidic acid, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the clinical application is limited due to suboptimal specificity and sensitivity. [4][5][6] Therefore, it is essential to explore new effective PDAC therapeutic targets and prognostic factors to adjust the treatment strategy for PDAC. Protein phosphatases play a critical role in cellular signaling pathways, and their dysregulated expression is significantly involved in cancer development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the clinical application is limited due to suboptimal specificity and sensitivity. [4][5][6] Therefore, it is essential to explore new effective PDAC therapeutic targets and prognostic factors to adjust the treatment strategy for PDAC. Protein phosphatases play a critical role in cellular signaling pathways, and their dysregulated expression is significantly involved in cancer development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clinical application is limited due to suboptimal specificity and sensitivity. 4 6 Therefore, it is essential to explore new effective PDAC therapeutic targets and prognostic factors to adjust the treatment strategy for PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our unified models produced AUCs of 0.872–0.903 on an independent, blinded testing cohort, representing superior performance compared with existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and lab-value-based ML models of PDAC classification (AUCs: ∼0.801–0.900). 47 , 48 Furthermore, the ML spatial signature distinguished OS by a median of nearly 2 years—a substantial finding for a disease with a 5-year survival rate of 20%–25% in the postoperative setting. 3 This approach could be used to stratify patients who may require more intensive therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Novel biomarkers, such as non-coding RNAs, exosomes, and circulating DNA, have been reported to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and could contribute to the facilitation of the incidental PDAC diagnosis [ 94 , 95 , 96 ]. However, intensive studies are still in progress to identify both diagnostic, predictive and prognostic markers that would facilitate the diagnosis of PDAC detected incidentally [ 97 ].…”
Section: Types Of Incidental Pancreatic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%