2023
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-nfq7h
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple User-Friendly Reaction Format

David F. Nippa,
Alex T. Müller,
Kenneth Atz
et al.

Abstract: Leveraging the increasing volume of chemical reaction data can enhance synthesis planning and improve suc- cess rates. However, machine learning applications for retrosynthesis planning and forward reaction prediction tools depend on having readily available, high-quality data in a structured format. While some public and licensed reaction databases are available, they frequently lack essential information about reaction condi- tions. To address this issue and promote the principles of findable, accessible, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utilisation of electronic lab notebooks [174][175][176] and the adoption of standardised formats for collecting and sharing data such as the Open Reaction Database (ORD) scheme could significantly improve the broadness of available data sets [42,43,[177][178][179]. Moreover, standardised protocols for performing experiments, for example for https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-xfdn8 ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-0208 Content not peer-reviewed by ChemRxiv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The utilisation of electronic lab notebooks [174][175][176] and the adoption of standardised formats for collecting and sharing data such as the Open Reaction Database (ORD) scheme could significantly improve the broadness of available data sets [42,43,[177][178][179]. Moreover, standardised protocols for performing experiments, for example for https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-xfdn8 ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-0208 Content not peer-reviewed by ChemRxiv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, automated extraction tools have been reported yielding the data in a structured format suitable for ML [37][38][39][40][41]. While some important efforts have been made to establish uniform data reporting standards [42,43], they are getting picked up by the community rather slowly. With data from experiments conducted by different scientists under varying conditions and adhering to various standards, reproducibility remains a major challenge in organic chemistry and restricts the applicability of literature data for statistical modelling [30].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%