2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplest tasks have greatest dual task interference with balance in brain injured adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these activities (climbing and riding toys, climbing trees, and cycling) more likely involve the sense of balance than knowledge of spatial relations. These two components are apparently not linked with each other (Brauer et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, these activities (climbing and riding toys, climbing trees, and cycling) more likely involve the sense of balance than knowledge of spatial relations. These two components are apparently not linked with each other (Brauer et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cognitive interference during postural demanding tasks—frequently occurring in everyday life—is known to comprise performance capacity and is related to an increased fall risk [5,4951]. Subjects balanced on the left leg on a spinning top while performing a cognitive dual task (Fig 2A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…postural, manual manipulation, language, calculation, auditory, visuospatial), and difficulty level, and had all demonstrated interference with postural tasks in balance-impaired elders including people with PD. The tasks included: carrying a tray with four wine glasses (motor-postural demand) [4,5,22], transferring coins between pockets (motor-manipulation), [5] saying as many words as possible beginning with certain letters, termed the controlled oral word association test (cognitive-words) [23], counting backwards by 3 s (cognitive-count) [24], an auditory choice reaction time task where participants reported if an auditory tone was high or low in pitch (cognitiveauditory) [25] and a visuospatial task where participants reported whether the spatial pattern of nine dots in one grid was the same or different from another grid (cognitive-visuospatial) [23]. The monochrome visuospatial task was presented via a projector onto the wall at the end of the walkway, resulting in a 1.6 m  2.1 m projection, with the diameter of each dot 20 cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%