Simplicity versus complexity

Porter, Chastain G.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(52)90100-5

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For extremely resorbed ridges, a consistent, repeatable, and easily verified centric relation recording may be achieved through using an intraoral gothic arch‐tracing device (Geneva Dental, Beverly Hills, CA) 11–14 . The work of Kapur and Yurkstas confirmed the findings of Trapozzano and Kingery that the central bearing assembly will provide equalization of occlusal pressure and increase base stability when mucosal resiliency is modest 11–13 .…”

Section: Centric Relationmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…It is the authors' opinion that the mandibular denture base stability is improved via linear occlusion, a steeper‐than‐conventional plane of occlusion, and an accurate centric relation recording by a central bearing intraoral gothic arch tracing. Linear occlusion has been reported to significantly reduce transverse force vectors and to provide a consistent vertical seating force in both centric and eccentric mandibular movement, thus improving stability 2,3 , 5 , 11–14 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maximizing Mandibular Prosthesis Stability Utilizing Linear Occlusion, Occlusal Plane Selection, and Centric Recording

Williamson

Bowley

et al. 2004

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The stability of mandibular complete dentures may be improved by reducing the transverse forces on the denture base through linear (noninterceptive) occlusion, selecting an occlusal plane that reduces horizontal vectors of force at occlusal contact, and utilizing a central bearing intraoral gothic arch tracing to record jaw relations. This article is intended to acquaint the reader with one technique for providing stable complete denture prostheses using the aforementioned materials, devices, and procedures.

show abstract

Section: Centric Relationmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%