Biopharmaceutical Processing 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100623-8.00027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplification of Buffer Formulation and Improvement of Buffer Control with In-Line Conditioning (IC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By operating at the lower limits of our miniaturized 3D developed device (19 × 9 × 5 cm), we could theoretically supply continuous on‐demand fresh medium for a 15 L perfusion bioreactor with a working volume of 10 L operating at 1 VVD. In addition, we believe that a nonintegrated stand‐alone version of our developed system similar to already existing automated buffer preparation units could also substantially contribute to the reduction of preparation and storage costs of cell culture media (Carredano et al, 2018 ; Gibson et al, 2019 ). The trend of outsourcing media and buffer preparation increased in the last decade, and we believe that an on‐demand reconstitution directly from solids would position itself on the biotherapeutic manufacturing and supplier of process materials side and by that reduce the logistical pressure (Langer, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By operating at the lower limits of our miniaturized 3D developed device (19 × 9 × 5 cm), we could theoretically supply continuous on‐demand fresh medium for a 15 L perfusion bioreactor with a working volume of 10 L operating at 1 VVD. In addition, we believe that a nonintegrated stand‐alone version of our developed system similar to already existing automated buffer preparation units could also substantially contribute to the reduction of preparation and storage costs of cell culture media (Carredano et al, 2018 ; Gibson et al, 2019 ). The trend of outsourcing media and buffer preparation increased in the last decade, and we believe that an on‐demand reconstitution directly from solids would position itself on the biotherapeutic manufacturing and supplier of process materials side and by that reduce the logistical pressure (Langer, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, CDM differ significantly in their powder characteristics and flow behavior from buffer species commonly used in the biopharmaceutical industry simply due to their more complex formulations and manufacturing (Fike et al, 2001 ; Salazar, Bleifuß, et al, 2016 ). In contrast, most used buffers in the biopharmaceutical industry, are consisting of a few salts (Carredano et al, 2018 ). For that reason, we had to adapt our device for the differences in powder flow behavior by redesigning the geometrical shape, power translation, and screw design (Figure 2 ; Jenike, 1964 ; McGlinchey, 2009 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed approach satisfactorily tracks the biomass profile with controller capable to maintain relevant growth conditions [42]. Feedback control loops such as flow feedback, pH feedback, or a combination of both have been applied for buffer preparation in inline conditioning and have shown significant potential [43,44]. For complex systems, PID control strategy has been modified as a nonlinear gain in sequence with a linear PID.…”
Section: Proportional Integral/proportional Integral Derivative (Pi/pid) Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-line conditioning (ILC) or In-line formulation (ILF) may provide a better solution management option, providing over 20× concentration factor for many solutions (Carredano et al, 2018). ILC does not simply dilute a solution with water, but mixes acid, base, concentrated untitrated buffer, and salt with water to achieve the correct solution composition.…”
Section: Solution Management Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%