2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified analysis of seismic in-plane stresses in composite and jointed tunnel linings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simplifiedload scheme of the rock around the tunnel, to simulate the dynamic effects of the presence of an earthquake on the lining of a circular and deep tunnel. Key: q dyn is the normal stress that simulates the presence of an earthquake; R: The tunnel radius (El Naggar et al, 2008;Penzien and Wu, 1998) where, * 2 a is a dimensionless coefficient: According to the Einstein and Schwartz analytical method (Einstein and Schwartz, 1979) and for the assumptions made, in particular for the eligibility of lining-tunnel wall relative displacements (full slip case), the normal forces induced by the earthquake in the lining are everywhere equal to zero. That fact is a consequence of the simplified calculation model adopted: Actually values of normal force, even if low and negligible, can be detected even when it is allowed a lining-rock relative displacement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplifiedload scheme of the rock around the tunnel, to simulate the dynamic effects of the presence of an earthquake on the lining of a circular and deep tunnel. Key: q dyn is the normal stress that simulates the presence of an earthquake; R: The tunnel radius (El Naggar et al, 2008;Penzien and Wu, 1998) where, * 2 a is a dimensionless coefficient: According to the Einstein and Schwartz analytical method (Einstein and Schwartz, 1979) and for the assumptions made, in particular for the eligibility of lining-tunnel wall relative displacements (full slip case), the normal forces induced by the earthquake in the lining are everywhere equal to zero. That fact is a consequence of the simplified calculation model adopted: Actually values of normal force, even if low and negligible, can be detected even when it is allowed a lining-rock relative displacement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the existence of underground tunnels, the response of the surrounding rock mass to the static or dynamic loadings will show great variation, especially when the dynamic interaction between the tunnels is considered. Because of the large dynamic stress resulting from the interaction between the tunnels, many rock tunnels have been damaged by earthquakes in recent years 3,4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as circular tunnels are concerned, El Naggar et al [13] developed a closed-form solution for moments and thrusts in a jointed composite tunnel lining, on the basis of external load scheme that was proposed by Peinzen and Wu [3], which is also used in this study. This solution has been adapted to evaluate the effect of in-plane shear stresses induced by ovaling deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been developed on the basis of the HRM that was proposed by Oreste [14], and then developed by Do et al [15,16]. Seismic loads are determined on the basis of in-plane shear stresses which were introduced in the works of Peinzen and Wu [3] and El Naggar et al [13]. The parameters that are necessary to calculate the tunnel lining under seismic loads are presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%