2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5012043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Dark Matter Models

Abstract: I review the construction of Simplified Models for Dark Matter searches. After discussing the philosophy and some simple examples, I turn the attention to the aspect of the theoretical consistency and to the implications of the necessary extensions of these models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(14) and Eq. (15). It is not difficult now to explain our results: When g 12 = 0, in order to get a large enough annihilation cross section (to induce the observed relic density) large value for the coupling g 1 is required.…”
Section: Direct Detectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14) and Eq. (15). It is not difficult now to explain our results: When g 12 = 0, in order to get a large enough annihilation cross section (to induce the observed relic density) large value for the coupling g 1 is required.…”
Section: Direct Detectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In building the WIMP models, the most minimal extensions to the SM look rationale to begin with. For a recent review on the various DM simplified models see [15] and references therein. The singlet scalar DM model [16,17,18] and the singlet fermionic DM model [19,20,21] exemplify the most minimal renormalizable WIMP models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This plays an important role in the resulting phenomenology, as we are going to discuss in detail. It is also noteworthy that such an interference term would be present also in the case of the analogous exchange of two scalar mediators [18][19][20]30].…”
Section: Vector Bi-portal Model At Direct Detection Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, in the eDMeft approach [1], the field content was enlarged by a dynamical (pseudo-)scalar (and potentially light) mediator S to the dark sector, the latter being represented by a scalar or fermionic field χ. Since both the mediator and the DM are assumed to be singlets under the SM gauge group, they can in principle interact via renormalizable couplings, however fully consistent interactions of the mediator with SM fermions (or gauge bosons) require D = 5 operators due to gauge invariance -which are not incorporated in typical simplified DM models [4][5][6][7]. In the eDMeft such couplings are included properly in the EFT framework, which is then consistently truncated at the D = 5 order, leading to a well controllable number of new parameters and avoiding the need to stick to a specific UV completion.…”
Section: Introduction and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%