2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2017.2696902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Finite Control Set-Model Predictive Control for Matrix Converter-Fed PMSM Drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These three phase currents include components located at fundamental grid frequency and higher frequencies. A High Pass Filter (HPF), whose transfer functions in continuous and discrete time domain are defined in (15) and (16) respectively, can be used to remove fundamental component and to obtain high frequency components which are responsible of supply current pollution. If these three phase currents idf(k+1) composed of high frequency components are subtracted from the supply current references, then this effectively reduces the magnitudes of high frequency harmonics in supply current and filter capacitor voltage.…”
Section: Active Damping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three phase currents include components located at fundamental grid frequency and higher frequencies. A High Pass Filter (HPF), whose transfer functions in continuous and discrete time domain are defined in (15) and (16) respectively, can be used to remove fundamental component and to obtain high frequency components which are responsible of supply current pollution. If these three phase currents idf(k+1) composed of high frequency components are subtracted from the supply current references, then this effectively reduces the magnitudes of high frequency harmonics in supply current and filter capacitor voltage.…”
Section: Active Damping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], in addition to conventional predictive approach for MCs, a cost term is added to cost function to reduce the number of commutations and consequently it decreases the switching losses. In [15], a method to decrease the computational burden of model predictive approach is proposed. This technique eliminates the prediction of threephase currents at sampling instant (k+1), and reduces the number of reactive power predictions and cost function evaluation from 25 to 10.…”
Section: Model Predictive Control Of An Indirect Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the GaN-based VFDs (using a standard three-phase two-level voltage source inverter) are commercially available in the industry, a matrix converter is becoming a popular alternative for next-generation motor drive systems [3][4][5][6][7]. Figure 1 shows the typical two-level voltage source inverter and the matrix converter block diagram for the VFDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, finite-control-set model predictive torque control (FCS-MPTC), which is considered as an alternative control strategy to DTC has been widely researched. It takes the advantage of the inherent discrete nature of power converters, predicts the future state of the system and select the optimal voltage vector which can minimize a predefined cost function [7][8][9]. In spite of advantages above, torque ripple and flux ripple are still inevitable for MPTC, since only one vector is selected during a fixed full control period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%