2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25405-5_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified High-Speed High-Distance List Decoding for Alternant Codes

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a simplified list-decoding algorithm to correct any number w of errors in any alternant code of any length n with any designed distance t + 1 over any finite field F q ; in particular, in the classical Goppa codes used in the McEliece and Niederreiter public-key cryptosystems. The algorithm is efficient for w close to, and in many cases slightly beyond, the F q Johnson bound J = n − n (n − t − 1) where n = n(q − 1)/q, assuming t + 1 ≤ n . In the typical case that qn/t ∈ (lg n) O(1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally the part of this work which, beyond Hensel's lemma, addresses Coppersmith's technique, might have, up to slight modifications, some use in applications of the latter, for instance the list decoding algorithm for CRT-type codes, see [2,6], or for RS-codes already pointed out in Section 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally the part of this work which, beyond Hensel's lemma, addresses Coppersmith's technique, might have, up to slight modifications, some use in applications of the latter, for instance the list decoding algorithm for CRT-type codes, see [2,6], or for RS-codes already pointed out in Section 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, as mentioned in Section 1, combinatorial list-decoding algorithms decode more errors, adding security for the same key size, by guessing a few error positions; in this case most decoding attempts fail (as in Section 7), and the analysis in [52] suggests that this makes Berlekamp's method faster than Patterson's method. Second, Berlekamp's method generalizes to algebraic list-decoding algorithms more easily than Patterson's method; see, e.g., [12]. Third, Berlekamp's method is of interest in a wider range of applications.…”
Section: A Complete Code-based Cryptosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then find all roots of this polynomial and output the set of corresponding support positions as the signature. We split the root-finding problem into 256 separate 2 12 -point evaluation problems, again allowing fast constant-time bitsliced arithmetic for a single signature.…”
Section: New Speed Records For Cfs Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. . , x σ are pairwise distinct, the best known cost bound for computing a minimal basis is O˜(m ω σ) (Bernstein, 2011;Cohn and Heninger, 2015;Nielsen, 2014); the cost bound O˜(m ω−1 σ) was achieved in (Chowdhury et al, 2015) with a probabilistic algorithm which outputs only one interpolant satisfying the degree constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%