2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1460396915000564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified material assignment for cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculations of prostate radiotherapy with hip prostheses

Abstract: ObjectiveCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images contain more scatter than a conventional computed tomography (CT) image and therefore provide inaccurate Hounsfield units (HUs). Consequently, CBCT images cannot be used directly for dose calculation. The aim of this study is to enable dose calculations to be performed with the use of CBCT images taken during radiotherapy and potentially avoid the necessity of re-planning.MethodologyA phantom and prostate cancer patient with a metallic prosthetic hip replace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, to provide a stronger validation for the proposed method we are looking forward to study the impact of HU error reduction on the dose calculation. Finally, for the use of MLT, five different tissue types were chosen in this study, while in [38] it was shown that the higher the number of classes the more the correction is accurate. Considering that increasing the number of classes may consequently increase the computation time, the automation of the proposed method and its testing under more efficient hardware architecture are currently being investigated for an online replanning process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to provide a stronger validation for the proposed method we are looking forward to study the impact of HU error reduction on the dose calculation. Finally, for the use of MLT, five different tissue types were chosen in this study, while in [38] it was shown that the higher the number of classes the more the correction is accurate. Considering that increasing the number of classes may consequently increase the computation time, the automation of the proposed method and its testing under more efficient hardware architecture are currently being investigated for an online replanning process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Almatani et al, 15 the binning of CBCT images of a patient with hip prosthesis into five HU values results in sufficiently accurate and clinically acceptable dose distribution. Considering more than five HU values provides more anatomical information and improves dose calculation accuracy (by 0.23%) but would require more operator time (58%), as the sensitivity increases when increasing the number of HU bins to define the material type.…”
Section: Modification Of Cone Beam Ct Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, none of the above studies used a patient with prostheses, which would provide a more general assessment of dose calculation using CBCT. Almatani et al 15 studied CBCT-based dose calculations of a patient with prostate cancer with a single hip prosthesis using the MLT algorithm. The work showed that it was necessary to extend the MLT algorithm to categorize pixel values into segments on a region-by-region basis, with the region size changing depending on the anatomical features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite its major improvement in image guided radiotherapy (IGRT), the image quality of CBCT images makes it hard to accurately identify the prostate, due to the increased amount of scatter (5)(6)(7). More importantly, the CBCT imaging dose limits the frequency with which this technique can be used (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLT algorithm has been used to enable dose calculation to be performed on CBCT images by the authors previously, even for more challenging circumstances as for a prostate patient with hip prostheses (6,7). This method does not require database, as for the atlas approach, nor extra non-clinical MR sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%