2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2021.3137876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Model for Heat Transport for Cables in Pipes

Abstract: This paper addresses challenges with modeling of heat transfer phenomenon for cables in duct or pipes when applying a numerical solution. Heat transport mechanisms between the cable and pipe surfaces are conduction, convection and radiation. Numerical calculation of convection when applying a finite element analysis (FEA), or other numerical tools requires heavy computation power and great skills of the program operator. In general, this is the most difficult part when modeling the heat transfer between the ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of published FEM solutions to IEC 60287 calculations for buried cables show generally good agreement [9], [10]. For cable laying geometries including convection as heat transport mechanism, good agreement to real cases, and in line with analytical solutions, is found using FEM [11]. For larger and more complex structures, such as duct banks, increasing discrepancy is found with increasing number of cables, due to the simplifications of electromagnetic couplings in the IEC standard.…”
Section: Femsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Comparison of published FEM solutions to IEC 60287 calculations for buried cables show generally good agreement [9], [10]. For cable laying geometries including convection as heat transport mechanism, good agreement to real cases, and in line with analytical solutions, is found using FEM [11]. For larger and more complex structures, such as duct banks, increasing discrepancy is found with increasing number of cables, due to the simplifications of electromagnetic couplings in the IEC standard.…”
Section: Femsupporting
confidence: 57%