2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Soil Liquefaction Assessment Based on Cumulative Kinetic Energy Density: Attenuation Law and Probabilistic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs. [15,24,25], however, these existing methods assume that the strain energy is linearly proportional to the upward propagating kinetic energy density [26] or in the case of [27]; proportional to Arias Intensity [28]. The energy density proposed by Sarma [26] is the integral of the squared velocity multiplied by the soil density and shear wave velocity, and is a measure of the total wave energy, unlike CASE which is the work done by the wave on a point of soil as it passes through it (see Section 3.5 for further comparison).…”
Section: Estimation Of Accumulated Strain Energy At Depth Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [15,24,25], however, these existing methods assume that the strain energy is linearly proportional to the upward propagating kinetic energy density [26] or in the case of [27]; proportional to Arias Intensity [28]. The energy density proposed by Sarma [26] is the integral of the squared velocity multiplied by the soil density and shear wave velocity, and is a measure of the total wave energy, unlike CASE which is the work done by the wave on a point of soil as it passes through it (see Section 3.5 for further comparison).…”
Section: Estimation Of Accumulated Strain Energy At Depth Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for 0.25 Hz ≤ f i ≤ 20 Hz, with Δf ≤ 0.05 Hz (1) where C i , f i , and Δf are the Fourier amplitude coefficient, the discrete fast Fourier transform (FFT) frequencies between 0.25 and 20 Hz, and the frequency interval used in the FFT computation, respectively. The ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) have been recently presented to predict IMs for design purposes (e.g., Ulusay et al, 2004;Atkinson and Boore, 2007;Campbell and Bozorgnia, 2007;Lin et al, 2011;Jafarian et al, 2014); Bastami and Soghrat, 2017;Farajpour et al, 2019). A few GMPEs have been proposed to estimate T m although it is a valuable IM for prediction of the seismic response of an engineering system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zafarani and Soghrat [16] proposed an empirical prediction equation based on the peak ground acceleration (PGA) obtained in different parts of Iran. Jafarian et al [17] proposed and developed an empirical model based on regression analyses. Dong et al [18] proposed the calculation method of landslide displacement considering the deterioration effect of structural plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%