2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2003)8:4(226)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Two-Parameter Gamma Distribution for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beginning of the synthetic unit hydrograph concept can be traced back to the distribution graph proposed by [6] to synthesize the UH from watershed characteristics, rather than the rainfall-runoff data [7]. The example of some of the traditional methods of SUHs can be referred in [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beginning of the synthetic unit hydrograph concept can be traced back to the distribution graph proposed by [6] to synthesize the UH from watershed characteristics, rather than the rainfall-runoff data [7]. The example of some of the traditional methods of SUHs can be referred in [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For known β, the application of equation (34) gives accurate estimates of n and K, which has been demonstrated using field and simulated data by Bhunya et al (2003).…”
Section: Two-parameter Gamma Distribution (2pgd) Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Stirling's formula [1] was used by [2] to get an approximate solution of (6) Equations (7a) and (7b) were derived using numerical simulation and optimization, and can be used to estimate n for known values of q p and t p . These equations avoid the widely practiced trial-and-error solution of n for given β [17].…”
Section: A 2pgd-based Suh Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [17] proposed an approximate analytical equation for calculating n and K (which define the shape and scale of the gamma distribution, respectively) from peak and time to peak of UH. Though the exact solution of n in terms of the non-dimensional shape factor β (= q p t p ) is difficult to evaluate, the Nash parameter n is accurately expressed mathematically in terms of β, by assuming n as a non-linear function of β, eliminating trials [2]. Shape factor can be taken as the form factor that quantifies the hydrograph peakedness and influences the hydrograph shape [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%