2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13089-2_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplifying Regular Expressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider the grammar for regular expressions proposed by Gruber and Gulan in Refs. [12,13], which has the major advantage of avoiding many redundant expressions built with the symbols ε and ∅. Given an alphabet Σ = {σ 1 , .…”
Section: Regular Expressions and Nfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider the grammar for regular expressions proposed by Gruber and Gulan in Refs. [12,13], which has the major advantage of avoiding many redundant expressions built with the symbols ε and ∅. Given an alphabet Σ = {σ 1 , .…”
Section: Regular Expressions and Nfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved version of this construction was redefined by Ilie and Yu, and called the ε-follow automaton. Gulan, Fernau and Gruber [12][13][14] studied the optimal (worst-case) size for all known constructions from regular expressions to ε-NFAs. It turns out that the optimal construction corresponds to the conversion of a regular expression in strong star normal form into an ε-follow automaton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alphabetic width awidth is the total number of alphabetic symbols from Σ (counted with multiplicity) [27,83]. Relations between these measures have been studied, e.g., in [27,28,42,66]. Theorem 2 Let L ⊆ Σ * be a regular language.…”
Section: Measures On Finite Automata and Regular Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-operator and instead forbid the use of / 0 and ε inside non-atomic expressions. This is sometimes more convenient, since one avoids unnecessary redundancy already at the syntactic level [42]. width n. In r we attach subscripts to each letter referring to its position (counted from left to right) in r. This yields a marked expression r with distinct input symbols over an alphabet Σ that contains all letters that occur in r. To simplify our presentation we assume that the same notation is used for unmarking, i.e., r = r. Then in order to describe the position automaton we need to define the following sets of positions on the marked expression.…”
Section: From Regular Expressions To Finite Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved version of this construction was redefined by Ilie and Yu, and called the ε-follow automaton. Gulan, Fernau and Gruber [12,10,11] studied the optimal (worst-case) size for all known constructions from regular expressions to ε-NFAs. It turns out that the optimal construction corresponds to the conversion of a regular expression in strong star normal form into an ε-follow automaton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%