2022
DOI: 10.3138/9781487528072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simply Institutional Ethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
7

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Rigid a priori theory was not applied. It has been argued that to do so risks blinding researchers to meaningful phenomena that fall outside a framework's expected findings (Smith, 2006), and that theory can be used later in the analytic process as a basis for comparison (Anfara & Mertz, 2015). Informed by interpretivist epistemology, this study sought to understand the intersecting lived experience of pandemic, prolapse and preoperative patienthood, as told by those who occupied this unique position (Schwandt, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rigid a priori theory was not applied. It has been argued that to do so risks blinding researchers to meaningful phenomena that fall outside a framework's expected findings (Smith, 2006), and that theory can be used later in the analytic process as a basis for comparison (Anfara & Mertz, 2015). Informed by interpretivist epistemology, this study sought to understand the intersecting lived experience of pandemic, prolapse and preoperative patienthood, as told by those who occupied this unique position (Schwandt, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Some women chose to delay surgery to protect vulnerable others in their social networks • Inconsistent hospital protocol and messaging caused considerable anxiety and led some women to temporarily cease treatment • Pandemic-related bathroom closures and social distancing imperatives made it easier to engage in shame-based self-isolation so risks blinding researchers to meaningful phenomena that fall outside a framework's expected findings (Smith, 2006), and that theory can be used later in the analytic process as a basis for comparison (Anfara & Mertz, 2015). Informed by interpretivist epistemology, this study sought to understand the intersecting lived experience of pandemic, prolapse and preoperative patienthood, as told by those who occupied this unique position (Schwandt, 2003).…”
Section: What This Paper Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study focused on IDs working in US-based institutions only. The study did not pursue other individuals, such as faculty, despite their involvement in collaborative online course development, in alignment with IE ontology (Ng et al, 2013;D. E. Smith, 2006) and the first author's discretion, with the second author's agreement, to anchor this study in the institutional narratives of IDs.…”
Section: Research Design: Respective Parallels Of Ie and Rtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual practices of power that inform people how they should define themselves instead of how they genuinely define themselves, that results in institutionalizing, coordinating, or mediating, both textually and systematically, everyday work (Griffith, 1995;D. E. Smith, 1990D. E. Smith, , 2006.…”
Section: Ruling Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IE researchers, the term “work” is considered as practical and generous and refers to “anything done by people that takes time and effort, that they mean to do, that is done under definite conditions and with whatever means and tools, and that they may have to think about it” ( Smith, 2005 , p. 151). The extended definition of work shines the light on what people do that will often go unrecognized or missed in the everyday use of the word ( Smith & Griffith, 2022 ). Work defined in this way speaks to the complex, intricate, and sophisticated nature of nurses’ work, the behaviors involved in accomplishing nurses’ work, and illustrates the knowledge, skills, and experiences involved in performing specific forms of nurses’ work.…”
Section: Research Approach: Institutional Ethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%