2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4573(99)00066-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SimSum: an empirically founded simulation of summarizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The method only dealt with removal of elements and used a very small corpus of compressed sentences, it was therefore extended in [76]. In professional abstracting settings [13], it was observed that in order to produce abstracts, textual fragments are usually combined to create new sentences and sometimes new linguistic material is included. Simulation of text abstracting operations have been implemented using rule-based and machine learning approaches in [21,61,62].…”
Section: Non-extractive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method only dealt with removal of elements and used a very small corpus of compressed sentences, it was therefore extended in [76]. In professional abstracting settings [13], it was observed that in order to produce abstracts, textual fragments are usually combined to create new sentences and sometimes new linguistic material is included. Simulation of text abstracting operations have been implemented using rule-based and machine learning approaches in [21,61,62].…”
Section: Non-extractive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this research's main goal is to extract sentences for final summary based on some selection features that signals importance of some sentences. Related research has shown that when humans perform the process of summarizing a document they tend to use readymade text passages -extracts- [78], where 80% of sentences in their generated Moreover, extractive approaches tend to be faster, easily extendable and retain most of the structure of the original document instead of flattening it. However, its main disadvantage is that by using certain techniques, it may become misleading in terms of structure.…”
Section: Proposed Methodology Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related research has shown that human abstractors use readymade text passages from source document for summarization (Endres‐Niggemeyer, 2002). Eighty percent of the sentences in the manmade abstracts were closely matched with sentences in source documents (Kupiec, Pedersen, & Chen, 1995).…”
Section: Automatic Text Summarization Using Salient Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%