Proceedings 1988 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI
DOI: 10.1109/iccd.1988.25758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated annealing on a multiprocessor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parallelisation of simulated annealing type algorithms were studied by several authors. A precursor work is [34], where the simulated annealing algorithm is mapped onto a dynamically structured tree of processors; the algorithm presented achieves speedups between log 2 N and (N + log 2 N)/2, N being the number of processors. Another important work is a volume edited by Robert Azencott, from which [35] is a paradigmatic chapter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallelisation of simulated annealing type algorithms were studied by several authors. A precursor work is [34], where the simulated annealing algorithm is mapped onto a dynamically structured tree of processors; the algorithm presented achieves speedups between log 2 N and (N + log 2 N)/2, N being the number of processors. Another important work is a volume edited by Robert Azencott, from which [35] is a paradigmatic chapter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we are interested in the problem of optimal ship routing taking into account only the wave height and direction by using the simulated annealing algorithm [5,6]. The simulated annealing method is an extension of a Monte Carlo method developed by Metropolis et al [7], to determine the equilibrium states of a collection of atoms at any given temperature T. Since the method was first proposed in [5,6], much research has been conducted on its use and properties [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The method itself is a technique which has attracted significant attention as suitable for optimization problems of large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the performance of nine typical scheduling algorithms: min-min [4], chaining [5], A * [6], genetic algorithms [1], simulated annealing [7], tabu search [8], as well as three popular list scheduling heuristics [9]: Highest Level First Known Execution Times (HLFET) [10], Insertion Scheduling Heuristic (ISH) [11], and Duplication Scheduling Heuristic (DSH) [12]. Since some of the heuristics were not originally designed to solve the problem in the presence of communication delays, we have adapted the algorithms to take into consideration the communication delays in these cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%