1996
DOI: 10.3133/wri954133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated effects of alternative withdrawal strategies on ground-water-flow patterns, New Jersey Pinelands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of groundwater flow in areas that include JBMDL, Pine Lake, or Little Pine Lake generally assume a gaining condition, without integrating the hydrolithologic heterogeneity of the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer system (Modica, 1996;Nicholson and Watt, 1997;AECOM, 2010;Cauller and others, 2016) or vertical hydraulic gradients (Watt and others, 1994;Watt and others, 2002;AECOM, 2010) as part of the assessment. Therefore, prior knowledge of groundwater conditions and groundwater/surface water interaction associated with these specific lakes is limited.…”
Section: Surface Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of groundwater flow in areas that include JBMDL, Pine Lake, or Little Pine Lake generally assume a gaining condition, without integrating the hydrolithologic heterogeneity of the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer system (Modica, 1996;Nicholson and Watt, 1997;AECOM, 2010;Cauller and others, 2016) or vertical hydraulic gradients (Watt and others, 1994;Watt and others, 2002;AECOM, 2010) as part of the assessment. Therefore, prior knowledge of groundwater conditions and groundwater/surface water interaction associated with these specific lakes is limited.…”
Section: Surface Watermentioning
confidence: 99%