2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated green turtle grazing affects benthic infauna abundance and community composition but not diversity in a Thalassia testudinum seagrass meadow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be taken into account that the ecosystem services evaluated (and the loss or gain under different treatments) are based on studies that measures in ecosystems with low presence of megafauna (both sharks and sea turtles) and contradicting effects are found. Examples of contradicting effects include some studies that have documented loss of ecosystem services due to increased grazing by green turtles in seagrass ecosystems (James et al, 2020 ) while others have found no effect or improvement to ecosystem services in grazed systems, including nutrient cycling, macroalgal diversity, sediment stabilization and erosion, and carbon sequestration (Christianen et al, 2012 ; Johnson et al, 2017 , 2019 , 2020 ; Molina Hernández & van Tussenbroek, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be taken into account that the ecosystem services evaluated (and the loss or gain under different treatments) are based on studies that measures in ecosystems with low presence of megafauna (both sharks and sea turtles) and contradicting effects are found. Examples of contradicting effects include some studies that have documented loss of ecosystem services due to increased grazing by green turtles in seagrass ecosystems (James et al, 2020 ) while others have found no effect or improvement to ecosystem services in grazed systems, including nutrient cycling, macroalgal diversity, sediment stabilization and erosion, and carbon sequestration (Christianen et al, 2012 ; Johnson et al, 2017 , 2019 , 2020 ; Molina Hernández & van Tussenbroek, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is probably due to the relatively low NPP of Bahamian seagrass meadows. Grazing may also be an important factor, through herbivores such as green turtles and conch 43,49 . Although longterm protection offered to tiger sharks in The Bahamas has likely helped to keep seagrass habitats from overgrazing through the top-down control of grazers 14 , our findings revealed a simultaneous decline of seagrass-derived C org in sediments after the 1980s, indicating disturbance of seagrasses around The Exumas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structurally complex seagrass areas support higher populations of fish (Jones et al 2021), and excessive turtle grazing, through a flow effect, undermines this habitat provisioning (Scott et al ). It is well known that highly grazed seagrass areas lose important fauna, including fisheries species (Johnson et al 2020, Inoue et al 2021. Therefore, the loss or collapse of seagrass structure poses significant well-being risks for fisherfolk who depend on seagrass and associated species as a source of food security or livelihoods through further flow effects (Arthur et al 2013).…”
Section: Unintended Consequences Of Charismatic Megafauna Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%