2018
DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-18-0073.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Kelvin–Helmholtz Waves over Terrain and Their Microphysical Implications

Abstract: Two Kelvin–Helmholtz (KH) wave events over western Washington State were simulated and evaluated using observations from the Olympic Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX) field campaign. The events, 12 and 17 December 2015, were simulated realistically by the WRF-ARW Model, duplicating the mesoscale environment, location, and structure of embedded KH waves, which had observed wavelengths of approximately 5 km. In simulations of both cases, waves developed from instability within an intense shear layer, caused by low-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also well noted that, above the boundary layer (approximately from 2.1 km to 3 km AGL), a fluctuation forms downwind from the mountain top. This agrees with the findings of Conrick et al [36] that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is likely to develop over complex terrain when there is a veering in wind direction. In Figure 11f, the water vapor mixing ratio distributes more evenly within the boundary layer, whereas the maximum value reduces compared to the morning time.…”
Section: Vertical Structuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is also well noted that, above the boundary layer (approximately from 2.1 km to 3 km AGL), a fluctuation forms downwind from the mountain top. This agrees with the findings of Conrick et al [36] that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is likely to develop over complex terrain when there is a veering in wind direction. In Figure 11f, the water vapor mixing ratio distributes more evenly within the boundary layer, whereas the maximum value reduces compared to the morning time.…”
Section: Vertical Structuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The model's difficulty in producing critical layers may be attributed to resolving complex terrain-induced flows. Conrick et al (2018) also used the WRF Model to analyze critical layers based on the Richardson number albeit with more success. A likely explanation may exist in the different scales of essential features being simulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A likely explanation may exist in the different scales of essential features being simulated. The wind shear in the simulations by Conrick et al (2018) was produced by synoptic features (terrain-modified shallow frontal passage and a low-level jet) while the terraindriven features we simulate are smaller scale. Only the blocked flow case produces dynamic instability (i.e., 0 , Ri , 0.25) in the actual KH wave region and the blocked flow (and postfrontal air mass) is deep enough to be resolved by the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Terradellas et al (2001) [48] showed that the periods induced by gravity waves were between 12 and 14 min, which was much shorter than the observed periods (15~40 min) in this study, and stated that the periods longer than 16 min might be caused by other processes such as KHI. Moreover, using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, Conrick et al (2018) [49] showed that KHI developed within the melting layer of stratiform precipitation when easterly flow near the surface increased, wind shear increased, and low-level stability decreased. As shown in Table 3, Type 1 cases where wave motions occurred are also characterized by increase in wind speed and u hs , but a decrease in N 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%