2006
DOI: 10.5688/aj7005119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Patients vs. Standardized Patients in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations

Abstract: Objectives. To describe the use of patient-actors as educators in a senior-level pharmacy practice course, and to contrast the value and application of ''standardized patient'' and ''simulated patient'' educational methodologies. Design. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) of the licensing examination were utilized during and at the end of the course along with external assessment to determine the impact of this educational methodology. Interviews with a randomly selected cohort of 14 students… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Conversely, the utilization of different graders for the same or even different tasks in OSCEs is acceptable from a learning standpoint, because interrater reliabilities have also been widely reported to be high. 10,12,15 Although we did not conduct any interrater reliability testing, the similarity in test scores has given us some hint that the perceived variability or lack of fairness in grading was not reflected in the actual marks between corresponding graders/stations. In order to make future OSCEs more transparent, valid, and reliable, they should not be conducted in 2 separate locations unless standardized participants are used as graders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Conversely, the utilization of different graders for the same or even different tasks in OSCEs is acceptable from a learning standpoint, because interrater reliabilities have also been widely reported to be high. 10,12,15 Although we did not conduct any interrater reliability testing, the similarity in test scores has given us some hint that the perceived variability or lack of fairness in grading was not reflected in the actual marks between corresponding graders/stations. In order to make future OSCEs more transparent, valid, and reliable, they should not be conducted in 2 separate locations unless standardized participants are used as graders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curricula also commonly engage pharmacy students in learning and assessment activities involving standardized or simulated patients based on similar education benefits. [8][9][10][11][12][13] While the benefit of using simulated patients has been well documented in both the medical and pharmacy education literature, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] less attention has been focused on the comparison of various simulated patient types. (Note: this manuscript uses the term simulated patient, which is more specific to people who are trained to represent a patient with a history and laboratory profile, rather than the broader term of standardized patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is concern regarding consistency of experiences when using standardized patients. [24][25][26] Simulation mannequins do not have these inherent limitations and, therefore, have been used to successfully educate healthcare professionals. [27][28][29][30] However, because mannequins can be cost-prohibitive for many programs, use of the simulation stethoscope seemed to provide an economically feasible opportunity for students to hear cardiac and pulmonary sounds in a more real-world scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%