2018
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1466811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated speaking environments for language learning: insights from three cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system could probably be classified as dialogue-based CALL, as defined by Bibauw, François & Desmet (2015), though its very limited scope makes it difficult to fit comfortably into any of their four categories. Indeed, many more sophisticated and capable systems have been developed (Xu & Seneff, 2009;van Doremalen, Boves, Colpaert, Cucchiarini, & Strik, 2016;Bodnar, Cucchiarini, Penning de Vries, Strik, & van Hout, 2017;Sydorenko, Smits, Evanini, & Ramanarayanan, 2018). However, a distinguishing point of the current system is that it is lightweight and can be freely obtained and deployed by anybody who has upload access to a website.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system could probably be classified as dialogue-based CALL, as defined by Bibauw, François & Desmet (2015), though its very limited scope makes it difficult to fit comfortably into any of their four categories. Indeed, many more sophisticated and capable systems have been developed (Xu & Seneff, 2009;van Doremalen, Boves, Colpaert, Cucchiarini, & Strik, 2016;Bodnar, Cucchiarini, Penning de Vries, Strik, & van Hout, 2017;Sydorenko, Smits, Evanini, & Ramanarayanan, 2018). However, a distinguishing point of the current system is that it is lightweight and can be freely obtained and deployed by anybody who has upload access to a website.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is crucial to allow for external evaluations and comparisons of systems. Very recent joint research efforts from academia and industry are showing, on this aspect, promising results (Sydorenko, Smits, Evanini & Ramanarayanan, 2018).…”
Section: Conclusion and Avenues For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of chatbot usage has also been carried out under the principles of the skill acquisition theory (Lyster & Sato, 2013), revealing that chatbots would be constructive tools for language learners thanks to their potential to provide structured oral practice (Sydorenko, Smits, Evanini & Ramanarayanan, 2019). Studies also sought to discover the potential of AI-powered chatbots for fostering oral interaction by raising awareness of specific L2 pragmatic structures based on Schmidt's (1995) noticing hypothesis (Timpe-Laughlin & Dombi, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgrounds In the Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%