2016
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evw065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating and Summarizing Sources of Gene Tree Incongruence

Abstract: We introduce a gene tree simulator that is designed for use in conjunction with approximate Bayesian computation approaches. We show that it can be used to determine the relative importance of hybrid speciation and introgression compared with incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) in producing patterns of incongruence across gene trees. Important features of the new simulator are (1) a choice of models to capture the decreasing probability of successful hybrid species formation or introgression as a function of gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our analyses have recovered a maximally‐supported phylogeny, with a topology congruent with recent broad‐scale phylogenies (Figure 2; Kitahara et al, 2016; Quek & Huang, 2019). We noted a slightly elevated level of gene tree incongruence among members of the “Robust” clade (Figure S1), which could be attributed to factors such as incomplete lineage sorting (Woodhams, Lockhart, & Holland, 2016) and varying phylogenetic signal between clades (Gonçalves, Simpson, Ortiz, Shimizu, & Jansen, 2019). Analyses similar to that of Ying et al (2018) performed at a broader scale would reveal factors driving these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, our analyses have recovered a maximally‐supported phylogeny, with a topology congruent with recent broad‐scale phylogenies (Figure 2; Kitahara et al, 2016; Quek & Huang, 2019). We noted a slightly elevated level of gene tree incongruence among members of the “Robust” clade (Figure S1), which could be attributed to factors such as incomplete lineage sorting (Woodhams, Lockhart, & Holland, 2016) and varying phylogenetic signal between clades (Gonçalves, Simpson, Ortiz, Shimizu, & Jansen, 2019). Analyses similar to that of Ying et al (2018) performed at a broader scale would reveal factors driving these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To address this, we need efficient summary statistics for detecting such events, and the present work is an early attempt. Follow‐up work should explore the utility of gene tree‐based summary statistics (e.g., metrics for shape, Fu & Li, 1993; Pybus & Harvey, 2000, or incongruence, Woodhams, Lockhart, & Holland, 2016), scenarios involving merging of non‐sister populations (Garrick et al., 2014; Kearns et al., 2018) or repeated fission‐fusion cycles (Alcala et al., 2016; Alcala & Vuilleumier, 2014), and assess the impact of simplifying assumptions (e.g., instantaneous fusion, recombination‐free neutral independent loci, or equivalence of cumulative N e between fusion and associated baseline scenarios). Notwithstanding remaining knowledge gaps, the capacity of phylogeographers to explicitly consider lineage fusion, owing to the field's transformation from data‐limited to data‐rich (Edwards, Shultz, & Campbell‐Staton, 2015; Garrick et al., 2015), represents a meaningful advancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first step, we randomly generated a species phylogenetic tree (i.e. first consensus tree here) T 1 with n leaves using the HybridSim [ 39 ] program. Then, using the same program, we generated K −1 other consensus trees, T 2 , …, T K with n leaves, each of which differed from T 1 by a specified number of hybridization events (the value of the hybridization rate parameter in the HybridSim program varied from 1 to 4 in our simulation; it was drawn randomly using a uniform distribution).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HybridSim program developed by Woodhams et al [ 39 ] allows generation of phylogenies in the presence of hybridization and horizontal gene transfer events. This program can generate trees differing from each other by a specified number of coalescence/incomplete lineage sorting producing patterns of incongruence across gene trees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%