2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating Deep Hubble Images With Semi-Empirical Models of Galaxy Formation

Abstract: We simulate deep images from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST ) using semi-empirical models of galaxy formation with only a few basic assumptions and parameters. We project our simulations all the way to the observational domain, adding cosmological and instrumental effects to the images, and analyze them in the same way as real HST images ("forward modeling"). This is a powerful tool for testing and comparing galaxy evolution models, since it allows us to make unbiased comparisons between the predicted and obs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary motivation here is to understand whether halo MARs are responsible for the mass and redshift dependence of the SFR main sequence and its scatter. Similar models have been explored in the past for different purposes, including generating mock catalogs (Taghizadeh-Popp et al 2015) and understanding the different clustering of quenched and star-forming galaxies (Becker 2015). Using halo MARs, we operationally infer galaxy SFRs as follows.…”
Section: Inferring Star Formation Rates From Halomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our primary motivation here is to understand whether halo MARs are responsible for the mass and redshift dependence of the SFR main sequence and its scatter. Similar models have been explored in the past for different purposes, including generating mock catalogs (Taghizadeh-Popp et al 2015) and understanding the different clustering of quenched and star-forming galaxies (Becker 2015). Using halo MARs, we operationally infer galaxy SFRs as follows.…”
Section: Inferring Star Formation Rates From Halomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We conclude that for the isolated galaxy case signal-to-noise ratio is a major factor in the surface brightness profile estimation. For example, see Taghizadeh-Popp et al (2015), who show an underestimate of galaxy size near the detection limit at multiple depths. This truncation in size is closely related to the bias in profile estimate.…”
Section: Sérsic Index Recovery With Various Sky Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mock observations of simulated galaxies are ideally suited to this task, as cosmological simulations now probe the complex star, gas, and dust geometry in the interstellar medium with high (sub-kiloparsec scale) resolution (e.g., Hopkins et al 2014;Schaye et al 2014;Vogelsberger et al 2014;Feldmann et al 2016). Recent studies have investigated the recovery of stellar masses (e.g., Wuyts et al 2009;Hayward & Smith 2015;Torrey et al 2015) and sizes (e.g., Wuyts et al 2010;Snyder et al 2015aSnyder et al , 2015bTaghizadeh-Popp et al 2015;Bottrell et al 2017) using mock observations. However, these studies have not simultaneously included dust, multiple viewing angles, high spatial resolution, observational point-spread functions (PSFs), and noise to test parameter recovery in high-redshift galaxies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%