2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.101.063308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating disordered quantum Ising chains via dense and sparse restricted Boltzmann machines

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While they have been demonstrated to work well in a number of problems so far [58,67,72,99], when it comes to learning the ground state of frustrated spin systems, such as the J 1 −J 2 model, holomorphic architectures for neural network quantum states exhibit certain deficiencies: first, the holomorphic constraint correlates the phase and amplitude gradients of the variational wavefunction parameters, which means that an update to the network parameters will cause a change in both the amplitude and the phase of the output. Therefore, fine-tuning of, e.g., only the phases is not possible using a holomorphic ansatz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While they have been demonstrated to work well in a number of problems so far [58,67,72,99], when it comes to learning the ground state of frustrated spin systems, such as the J 1 −J 2 model, holomorphic architectures for neural network quantum states exhibit certain deficiencies: first, the holomorphic constraint correlates the phase and amplitude gradients of the variational wavefunction parameters, which means that an update to the network parameters will cause a change in both the amplitude and the phase of the output. Therefore, fine-tuning of, e.g., only the phases is not possible using a holomorphic ansatz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results raise the natural question as to why neural quantum states approximate much better the ground states of other models, e.g., Ising, Heisenberg, Bose-Hubbard, etc. [58,67,72,99]. We currently believe that, for these models, even when the variational ansatz is expressive enough to capture the true ground state, independently initialized simulations still end up in distinct landscape minima characterized by different values of the network parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last few years, the study of quantum systems has taken advantage of the increasing interest in and the developments of machine learning techniques to face both theoretical and experimental challenges, which has led to the emergence of the broad field of quantum machine learning [1][2][3][4][5]. Some successful examples of the use of machine learning include, among others, the detection and classification of quantum phases [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], the prediction of the ground state energy and other characteristic quantities of quantum systems [14][15][16][17], and the enhanced control and readout in experimental setups [18][19][20][21]. Additionally, many efforts are devoted to developing machine learning algorithms that exploit quantum resources, aiming to find a quantum advantage in performing tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a) for a depiction of an RBM. Together with RBMs [2,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], other network structures such as a feed-forward [34][35][36][37][38], recurrent [39,40] and convolutional neural networks [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] have also been intensively studied. The significant interest in the field is attributed to the fact that these networks could offer possibility to fight against the curse of dimensionality in many-body quantum systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%