2011
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2010.501928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating Industrial Spray-Drying Operations Using a Reaction Engineering Approach and a Modified Desorption Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, this equation is the "fingerprint" of a material's drying behavior. These kinetics data can be implemented into simulation programs home-made [41,42] or commercially available computational fluid dynamics modeling software with specific user established operating files for scale up studies and industrial spray dryer design [43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Drying Modeling Based On Single Droplet Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, this equation is the "fingerprint" of a material's drying behavior. These kinetics data can be implemented into simulation programs home-made [41,42] or commercially available computational fluid dynamics modeling software with specific user established operating files for scale up studies and industrial spray dryer design [43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Drying Modeling Based On Single Droplet Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the theoretical drying models available are the characteristic drying curve approach, the diffusion based model, and the reaction engineering approach (REA) (Fyhr and Kemp 1998;Mezhericher et al 2010). The robustness of REA in predicting drying performance, as well as for process design evaluation, has been demonstrated in various case studies (Woo et al 2008;Zhu et al 2011;Putranto et al 2011a,b;Rogers et al 2012). This approach only requires a small number of accurate experimental runs and does not require many coefficients that are experimentally difficult to obtain, in order to be applied for a dryer-wide modelling (Putranto et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been tested for over 30 different dairy concentrates and several spray dryers according to different scales (from 5 kg h À1 to 6 t h À1 ). A good match between measured and predicted parameters (±1-5% error) has been reported Zhu et al, 2011). A predictive tool based on this drying by desorption method is now marketed under the name 'Spray drying parameter simulation and determination software' SD 2 P Ò in order to determine or optimize the key process parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As shown in figure 1, drying by desorption can be divided into two periods: the constant evaporation rate stage (from the beginning to about 100 min for a skim milk concentrate at 40% TS, which includes a preheating stage for the first 10 min (not visible in figure 1) (Zhu et al, 2011)) and the decreasing evaporation rate stage (time above 100 min.). The boundary between these two periods can slightly vary for different concentrates.…”
Section: Calculation Of Evaporation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%