2006
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200610595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating large‐scale structure formation with magnetic fields

Abstract: Abstract. In the past, different works based on numerical simulations have been presented to explain magnetic fields (MFs) in the large scale structure and within galaxy clusters. In this review, I will summarize the main findings obtained by different authors and -even if many details are still unclear -I will try to construct a consistent picture of our interpretation of largescale magnetic fields based on numerical effort. I will also sketch how this is related to our understanding of radio emission and sum… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dolag 2006;Dubois & Teyssier 2008;Dolag & Stasyszyn 2009;Donnert et al 2009;Collins et al 2010), even if without affecting the spectral properties outlined in Sect. 3.3 for a wide range of scales (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dolag 2006;Dubois & Teyssier 2008;Dolag & Stasyszyn 2009;Donnert et al 2009;Collins et al 2010), even if without affecting the spectral properties outlined in Sect. 3.3 for a wide range of scales (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Col. (1) reproduced provided that also the magnetic field scales with cluster mass, temperature or luminosity (e.g. Dolag & Ensslin 2000;Miniati et al 2001;Cassano et al 2006;Dolag 2006).…”
Section: Evolution Of Radio Halos and Connection With Cluster Mergersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, assuming that the ICM is magnetised at μG level, radio halos generated by secondary emission are expected long-living and common; also, some trend between their radio power and the X-ray luminosity or temperature of the hosting clusters is expected (Dolag & Ensslin 2000;Miniati et al 2001;Dolag 2006;Pfrommer et al 2008). Due to the huge uncertainties in the physics of shock acceleration one may easily believe that large variations of the content of relativistic protons are possible among clusters with similar mass (temperature...), however there is no reason to expect a bi-modality in the cluster synchrotron emission.…”
Section: Hadronic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correlation is not subjected to selection effects, at least for high X-ray luminosities (Log(L X ) > 44.6 erg/s; e.g., Clarke 2005;Dolag 2006;) and it implies that the average brightness of RHs increases with the X-ray luminosity of the parent cluster (Feretti 2005;CBS06). If we scale the radio brightness with the cluster X-ray luminosity, the sensitivity limit in radio surveys will set the minimum surface brightness of a RH to be detected, and then a limiting X-ray luminosity of the hosting clusters.…”
Section: The Xbac-nvss Subsamplementioning
confidence: 99%