“…In the bulk, the difference between the measurement temperature T and glass transition temperature T g , ( T – T g ), is generally a good predictor of relative segmental relaxation rates, provided that the Vogel–Fulcher–Tamann (VFT), or equivalent Williams–Landel–Ferry (WLF), relationship holds and associated physical constants of the polymer are known. With regard to thin films, the situation can be more complex, due largely to effects associated with the close proximity of the external interfaces. , Typically, a decrease of the T g occurs with decreasing film thickness h for sufficiently thin ( h ∼ tens of nanometers) freely standing films. , Near a free surface, simulations − reveal the existence of a mobile surface layer with thicknesses on the order of nanometers and significantly faster dynamics than the bulk for linear chain polymers. For asymmetrically confined films (hard substrate/film/air), the T g increases with decreasing h when the interactions between the polymer segments and the substrate are strong, e.g., hydrogen bonding; , interactions of chain segments in contact with a “wall” reduce the relaxation rates of the chains because of the associated increase of activation barriers for torsional relaxations.…”