2005
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2004.0125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating Solute Transport in Porous or Fractured Formations Using Random Walk Particle Tracking: A Review

Abstract: Traditional Eulerian approaches to solute transport generally require very fine discretization of the transport Since the first attempts some 20 yr ago in the field of hydrology, domain to overcome recurrent problems of unstable nurandom walk (RW) particle tracking as applied to solute transport has experienced profound changes. Concepts and mathematical tech-merical solutions and/or artificial diffusion. Solving such niques have improved to the point that numerically difficult problems problems generally impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
143
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(111 reference statements)
2
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to former researches [30,31], the difficulty of discovering nuclide transport mechanism lies in solving the partial differential transport equation. As mentioned by Delay et al [32], Lagrangian schemes (particle tracking methods) are more accurate and less computationally intensive than Eulerian schemes. The main Lagrangian schemes include random-walk particle tracking (RWPT) method [33,34], convolution-based particle tracking (CBPT) method [35,36], and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) method [37,38].…”
Section: Literature Review About Nuclide Transport Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to former researches [30,31], the difficulty of discovering nuclide transport mechanism lies in solving the partial differential transport equation. As mentioned by Delay et al [32], Lagrangian schemes (particle tracking methods) are more accurate and less computationally intensive than Eulerian schemes. The main Lagrangian schemes include random-walk particle tracking (RWPT) method [33,34], convolution-based particle tracking (CBPT) method [35,36], and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) method [37,38].…”
Section: Literature Review About Nuclide Transport Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trace of the fracture was 10 m, fluid velocity was 4.0 × 10 −4 m/s, hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient in the fracture was 2.0 × 10 −5 m 2 /s, and the aperture of the fracture was 2.5 × 10 −4 m. Thus, the Peclet number (Pe = / ) was 200. The analytical solution can be obtained using (32). The corresponding numerical solution was obtained using the TDRW method implemented into UDEC, which is compared in Figure 5 with the analytical solution.…”
Section: Calibration Test 1: Particle Transport In a Single Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advective-diffusive mass transport of conservative tracers in the interparticle void space was simulated using the random-walk particle-tracking technique [19]. The idea of the method is to distribute a large amount of tracers (N = 4 × 10 6 in our study) in the volume of interest and to track target quantities (tracer trajectories, statistical moments of the tracer ensemble, etc.)…”
Section: (C) Simulation Of Mass Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle displacement during a given time step includes a deterministic displacement along flow-path lines to simulate advection and may also include an additional stochastic displacement to simulate dispersion (or diffusion), as in the well-known random walk (RW) method. The reader is referred to Delay et al [2005] and Salamon et al [2006] for comprehensive reviews of space-based particle-tracking methods, including theoretical, conceptual, and numerical developments in the field of subsurface hydrology since the early works of Ahlstrom et al [1977] and Prickett et al [1981]. Additional recent publications of relevance include Bechtold et al [2011] and Lejay and Pichot [2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%