2001
DOI: 10.1116/1.1409387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the effects of pattern density gradients on electron-beam projection lithography pattern transfer distortions

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inProximity and heating effects during electron-beam patterning of ultraviolet lithography masks Electron projection lithography mask format layer stress measurement and simulation of pattern transfer distortion J.Proximity effect correction using pattern shape modification and area density map for electron-beam projection lithography J.The development of a low-distortion mask is critical to the success of the sub-0.1 m lithography technologies. Electron-beam projection lithograp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] The Sematech funded study also confirmed University of Wisconsin modeling results that pattern density gradients have the worst impact on IP. [15] For example, a subfield that was half-filled with a dense pattern (the other half being unpatterned) caused a large image placement distortion along the line of highest pattern density gradient. Unlike simple magnification corrections, this effect is not easily corrrectable and most likely sets the upper bound on allowable membrane stress.…”
Section: Pattern and Materials Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] The Sematech funded study also confirmed University of Wisconsin modeling results that pattern density gradients have the worst impact on IP. [15] For example, a subfield that was half-filled with a dense pattern (the other half being unpatterned) caused a large image placement distortion along the line of highest pattern density gradient. Unlike simple magnification corrections, this effect is not easily corrrectable and most likely sets the upper bound on allowable membrane stress.…”
Section: Pattern and Materials Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three main factors that contribute to image placement distortions are: shape of the mask, accuracy of the e-beam writer, and stress of the materials. Past publications have shown that there is the ability to correct image placement distortions during the exposure of the mask on the wafer [1,2]. Although image placement distortions can be corrected using these techniques, they cannot completely correct all of the distortions and the stress of the membranes still needs to be extremely low to meet the strict image placement specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1][2][3][4] In this study, FE structural models simulated productionlike EPL masks fabricated from 200-mm-diam silicon wafers with two 55 mmϫ 132 mm membrane areas separated by a 10-mm-wide major strut. For this target node, the development of a lowdistortion mask is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%