2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the interstellar medium and stellar feedback on a moving mesh: implementation and isolated galaxies

Abstract: We introduce the Stars and MUltiphase Gas in GaLaxiEs -SMUGGLE model, an explicit and comprehensive stellar feedback model for the moving-mesh code AREPO. This novel sub-resolution model resolves the multiphase gas structure of the interstellar medium and self-consistently generates gaseous outflows. The model implements crucial aspects of stellar feedback including photoionization, radiation pressure, energy and momentum injection from stellar winds and from supernovae. We explore this model in high-resolutio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
139
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
(290 reference statements)
5
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The star formation efficiency is a free parameter which is set to = 0.01, in line with recent observational estimates (Krumholz & Tan 2007). Additionally, following the SMUGGLE implementation, we impose the condition that the star forming gas cloud needs to be self-gravitating in order to form stars (Equation 9; Marinacci et al 2019). Although we do follow the formation of molecular hydrogen in our simulations, we choose not to tie the star formation rate to the abundance of H 2, with the goal of recovering the molecular Kennicutt-Schmidt (Bigiel et al 2008;Leroy et al 2008) relation naturally in our simulations without the need to impose it.…”
Section: Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The star formation efficiency is a free parameter which is set to = 0.01, in line with recent observational estimates (Krumholz & Tan 2007). Additionally, following the SMUGGLE implementation, we impose the condition that the star forming gas cloud needs to be self-gravitating in order to form stars (Equation 9; Marinacci et al 2019). Although we do follow the formation of molecular hydrogen in our simulations, we choose not to tie the star formation rate to the abundance of H 2, with the goal of recovering the molecular Kennicutt-Schmidt (Bigiel et al 2008;Leroy et al 2008) relation naturally in our simulations without the need to impose it.…”
Section: Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, increases in computational power have made it possible to simulate galaxy formation in a more resolved manner. These models have prescriptions for low temperature gas cooling, supernova (SN) energy and momentum input based on high resolution simulations of SN explosions (e.g., Thornton et al 1998;Kim & Ostriker 2015;Martizzi et al 2015) and a stochastic model for photoheating and radiation pressure feedback (Hopkins et al 2014(Hopkins et al , 2018bSmith et al 2018;Marinacci et al 2019). The resulting simulations partially resolve giant molecular clouds, which are the sites for star formation, produce a multiphase interstellar medium (ISM) in a self-consistent manner, and reproduce resolved properties of galaxies such as local group dwarfs (Wetzel et al 2016;Smith et al 2019), globular cluster formation (Ma et al 2019), and disc morphology and kinematics (Ma et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cosmological simulations typically include so-called sub-grid physics that aims to represent underlying physics that is below the (mass) resolution limit (which is usually around 10 3−7 M ; Schaye 2010; Vogelsberger et al 2014;Schaye et al 2015;Hopkins et al 2018;Davé et al 2019;Marinacci et al 2019). This is commonplace in many fields, and is essential in galaxy formation to reproduce many of the observed properties of galaxies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%