2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating tree growth response to climate change in structurally diverse oak and beech forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(132 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the response of vegetation NPP to climate change has become a hot topic in global change research, most of them focus on grassland or forest ecosystems (de Wergifosse et al., 2022; Machado‐Silva et al., 2021; Nanzad et al., 2021; Zarei et al., 2021). Until recently, there have been relatively few studies on the response of marsh vegetation NPP to climatic change (Hirota et al., 2007; Mao et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the response of vegetation NPP to climate change has become a hot topic in global change research, most of them focus on grassland or forest ecosystems (de Wergifosse et al., 2022; Machado‐Silva et al., 2021; Nanzad et al., 2021; Zarei et al., 2021). Until recently, there have been relatively few studies on the response of marsh vegetation NPP to climatic change (Hirota et al., 2007; Mao et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The documented age trend in site productivity is likely due to the effect of climate and environmental change, and has been observed for different species and biomes (di Filippo et al, 2010;Nunes et al, 2015;de Wergifosse et al, 2022). The influence of non-static factors, such as increasing nitrogen deposition and rising temperatures and CO 2 concentrations, has been recognized as the main cause of site productivity increases (Nunes et al, 2015;de Wergifosse et al, 2022). Site index is a good indicator of the effect of climate change on tree growth and site productivity (Socha et al, 2016;Pau et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the development of country scale geocentric SI models for oak could partly close this knowledge gap and contribute to our understanding of the impact of multiple environmental factors on site productivity for this important forest-forming tree species. Reliable determination of site productivity is critical for effective forest management in changing climate conditions (Bontemps & Bouriaud, 2014;Sharma et al, 2015;Sharma & Parton, 2018de Wergifosse et al, 2022). Therefore, the study of factors affecting site productivity for oak stands is of great importance, both from practical and scientific points of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistic models are often regarded as having a larger degree of uncertainty than empirical models -due to their larger number of parameters (Adams et al, 2013), but mechanistic models of vegetation dynamics can achieve good performance when calibrated for specific stands and parameter estimates are carefully chosen for target species (de Wergifosse et al, 2022;Forrester et al, 2021). In the case of mechanistic trait-enabled models, one can expect substantial biases with respect to the prediction forest dynamics because key parameters of demographic processes are unlikely to be matched by observable database traits.…”
Section: The Value Of Trait-enabled Models For the Projection Of Fore...mentioning
confidence: 99%