2014
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbu033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating welfare effects of the European nutrition and health claims' regulation: the Italian yogurt market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our framework combines an oligopolistic supply side with a discrete choice demand model, following other analyses in the industrial organisation literature (Berry et al 1995; Nevo 2001; Petrin 2002; Bonanno et al 2015). The supply side considers firms as oligopolists following a two‐stage decision process, deciding whether to commit labelling fraud first and then competing on prices, playing a Bertrand game.…”
Section: An Empirical Economic Model Of Labelling Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our framework combines an oligopolistic supply side with a discrete choice demand model, following other analyses in the industrial organisation literature (Berry et al 1995; Nevo 2001; Petrin 2002; Bonanno et al 2015). The supply side considers firms as oligopolists following a two‐stage decision process, deciding whether to commit labelling fraud first and then competing on prices, playing a Bertrand game.…”
Section: An Empirical Economic Model Of Labelling Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand side models the aggregation of consumers' discrete choices where each product's market share represents the probability that a product is chosen. Following the work of Bonanno et al (2015), who simulated welfare changes in the presence of false health claims, we use the estimated demand coefficients and the calculated Nash ‐ Bertrand short‐run profits to determine the amount of consumers' welfare losses incurred by overpayment for a false label and the resulting producer surplus. We then compare the counterfactual producer surplus to simulated gains from fraud, calculated using input price differential data, to present a range of the estimated extent of welfare losses due to fraud.…”
Section: An Empirical Economic Model Of Labelling Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations