2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and Design Tool for ORC Axial Turbine Stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macchi and Perdichizzi [3] Axial flow Fixed recovery a Lozza et al [5] Axial flow Fixed recovery a Da Lio et al [6] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Astolfi and Macchi [7] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Da Lio et al [8] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Al Jubori et al [9] Axial flow Not considered Talluri and Lombardi [10] Axial flow Not considered Tournier and El-Genk [11] Axial flow Not considered Meroni et al [12] Axial flow Not considered Meroni et al [13] Axial flow Not considered Meroni et al [14] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Perdichizzi and Lozza [15] Radial inflow Fixed recovery a Uusitalo et al [16] Radial inflow Not considered Rahbar et al [17] Radial inflow Not considered Da Lio et al [18] Radial inflow Not considered Pini et al [19] Radial outflow Fixed recovery a Casati et al [20] Radial outflow Fixed recovery a Bahamonde et al [4] Axial flow Radial inflow Radial outflow Not considered a Fixed recovery of the total kinetic energy. b Fixed recovery of the meridional kinetic energy.…”
Section: Reference Turbine Type Diffuser Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macchi and Perdichizzi [3] Axial flow Fixed recovery a Lozza et al [5] Axial flow Fixed recovery a Da Lio et al [6] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Astolfi and Macchi [7] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Da Lio et al [8] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Al Jubori et al [9] Axial flow Not considered Talluri and Lombardi [10] Axial flow Not considered Tournier and El-Genk [11] Axial flow Not considered Meroni et al [12] Axial flow Not considered Meroni et al [13] Axial flow Not considered Meroni et al [14] Axial flow Fixed recovery b Perdichizzi and Lozza [15] Radial inflow Fixed recovery a Uusitalo et al [16] Radial inflow Not considered Rahbar et al [17] Radial inflow Not considered Da Lio et al [18] Radial inflow Not considered Pini et al [19] Radial outflow Fixed recovery a Casati et al [20] Radial outflow Fixed recovery a Bahamonde et al [4] Axial flow Radial inflow Radial outflow Not considered a Fixed recovery of the total kinetic energy. b Fixed recovery of the meridional kinetic energy.…”
Section: Reference Turbine Type Diffuser Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean span wise velocity field is observed to be much more related to cross flow turbine's wake recovery. Guide lines for the design optimization of efficient high supersonic passages were also derived [18][19][20].…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Axial Flow Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the selection and the design of the expander are of paramount importance. Axial turbines are widespread used for plants with power production between 500 kW and few MWs [16], while radial turbines are better suited for the lower power ranges (50-500 kW), due to their low degree of reaction and therefore their capability of dealing with large enthalpy drops at low peripheral speeds, allowing the adopting a single stage design [17][18][19]. Finally, for very small and micro power range applications (hW to about 50 kW), volumetric expanders, like scrolls or screws, are usually utilized, although their efficiency is limited by leakages, friction and heat transfer losses [20][21][22].…”
Section: Small Power Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%