2016
DOI: 10.1080/0740817x.2016.1217103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and optimization of continuous-flow production systems with a finite buffer by using mathematical programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We understand the effects of system features such as processing rates and buffer capacities, processing time variability, machine reliability, and material flow on system performance through analytical models of production systems. These models enable us to estimate the performance of a material flow system and optimize design parameters of the system [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We understand the effects of system features such as processing rates and buffer capacities, processing time variability, machine reliability, and material flow on system performance through analytical models of production systems. These models enable us to estimate the performance of a material flow system and optimize design parameters of the system [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical techniques and simulation expertise are useful alternatives for analyzing the arising complexity of manufacturing models. For instance, Hosseini and Tan [25] presented an analytical simulation approach to analyze the performance of a continuous production system; their method provided solutions considerably faster than solely evaluating the system dynamics at critical times. They determined time instances of the trajectory of the buffer, stock level dynamics, and changing flow rates.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this table, the rows classify the studies presented in the literature review in five main areas, and the columns present the key factors investigated in these studies. [4] Rivera-Gómez et al [5] Hajej and Rezg [6] (b) Production-quality-maintenance strategies Bouslah et al [7] Fakher et al [8] Cheng et al [9] Abubakar et al [10] Ait-El-Cadi et al [11] Hajej et al [12] (c) Production and subcontracting planning Assid et al [13] Ben-Salem et al [14] Haoues et al [15] Ayed et al [16] Rivera-Gómez et al [17] Kammoun et al [18] (d) Deteriorating systems Boudhar et al [19] Martinod et al [20] Ouaret et al [21] Polotski et al [22] Dellagi et al [23] Magnanini and Tolio [24] (e) Simulation approach Hosseini and Tan [25] Guiras et al [26] Abdolmaleki et al [27] Rivera-Gómez et al [28] Assid et al [29] Ait-El-Cadi et al [30] (f) Additional issues Fathollahi-Fard et al [31] Jian et al [32] Villalonga et al [33] Chen et al [34] Fathollahi-Fard et al [35] Gholizadeh et al [36] Villalonga et al [37] The proposed model…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Turki et al [24] determined an optimal buffer size for a single-product machine with random failures. In Hosseini and Tan [25], each stage in a two-stage system has different states of processing with general distribution of transition times. The authors developed a mixed-integer linear programming model to determine optimal level of buffer by maximizing profit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%