2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61382-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and Testing of a Platooning Management Protocol Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section compare the simulation results of the proposed work with literature as depicted in Figure 10. The average duration time by our proposed protocol (IMMP) is much lower in comparison to Bruno Ribeiro [30], M. Segata [13] and Amoozadeh [11]. In the joining manoeuver as shown in Figure 10(a), IMMP has a less duration time and hence outperforms the existing ones.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section compare the simulation results of the proposed work with literature as depicted in Figure 10. The average duration time by our proposed protocol (IMMP) is much lower in comparison to Bruno Ribeiro [30], M. Segata [13] and Amoozadeh [11]. In the joining manoeuver as shown in Figure 10(a), IMMP has a less duration time and hence outperforms the existing ones.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the joining manoeuver as shown in Figure 10(a), IMMP has a less duration time and hence outperforms the existing ones. Whereas, in leaving manoeuver shown in Figure 10(b), the IMMP has a better performance comparative to [30], though IMMP and [11] have equal duration time but still IMMP is better than [11] because it takes 7 s for a single manoeuver whereas in our case dual manoeuver takes 7 s. Moreover, in join and leave (case1 and case2) manoeuvers there is no protocol in literature to compare with as we are the first to do it and is the benchmark for the research community as depicted in Figure 10(c,d).…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ming and Zhao [68] built a general testing framework based on Veins for securing VANET applications. Ribeiro and Gonçalves [69] tested a Platooning Management Protocol with VSimRTI framework.…”
Section: V2x Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Platooning application was previously developed in simulation framework VSimRTI [29], and tested in simulation only scenarios [30] while the agnostic communications interface software was being designed and tested. When the first OBU board prototypes became available for testing, the Platooning Management Controller was also deployed in a hybrid testbed, integrating the simulation with the real time communications hardware.…”
Section: Figure 8: Platooning Deployment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The access to the vehicles' real time data and the communication interface with the commercial OBU boards have been accomplished using the ITS-LCI communication layer and its implementation is presented in Figure 9. This new architectural approach has already been applied with a simulated implementation of such a platooning management protocol [30] using the V2X Simulation Run-time Infrastructure (VSimRTI) [29], a simulation framework able to couple and integrate other well known simulators, such as SUMO and Network Simulator (version 3) on top of a common infrastructure.…”
Section: Figure 8: Platooning Deployment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%