2020 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/aparm49247.2020.9209516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation-based approach for risk assessment in onshore wind farm construction projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the use of SimphonyProject.NET addresses common practical limitations associated with MCS-CPM, including difficulty interpreting results (Senesi et al 2015) and modeling of simulation inputs. By making use of popular scheduling techniques, such as the CPM and MCS (Karabulut 2017;Mohamed et al 2020a), SimphonyProject.NET is able to simulate project cost and duration in consideration of project risks.…”
Section: Modeling and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the use of SimphonyProject.NET addresses common practical limitations associated with MCS-CPM, including difficulty interpreting results (Senesi et al 2015) and modeling of simulation inputs. By making use of popular scheduling techniques, such as the CPM and MCS (Karabulut 2017;Mohamed et al 2020a), SimphonyProject.NET is able to simulate project cost and duration in consideration of project risks.…”
Section: Modeling and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop the model, common components of onshore wind farm construction were identified and abstracted. Previous studies were reviewed [45,47,48], and a typical onshore wind farm project was found to be comprised of six major work packages: site preparation, the foundation, turbine assembly, the collection system, mechanical completion, and commissioning. Each of these work packages was further partitioned into more detailed work-packages, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: • Construction Process Configuration;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these work packages was further partitioned into more detailed work-packages, as shown in Figure 3. As the proposed method requires weather impacts on activity duration to be determined, the work packages were further partitioned at the activity level following a detailed review of: (1) previous onshore wind farm construction projects available in literature [2,3,45,47] and (2) 10 real onshore wind farm projects, as detailed in Supplementary Materials (Table S1). The detailed activities within each work package, and the logical relationships between them, are illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: • Construction Process Configuration;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rolik [46] proposed a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis approach to assess the risk level in wind energy projects. Mohamed and colleagues [47] proposed a simulation-based approach to assess the severity of risk factors on the cost and time of onshore wind projects. Because of the lack of historical data, triangular and uniform distributions were used to depict the cost and schedule impact of the identified risk factors [47].…”
Section: Construction Risk Assessment In Onshore Wind Project and Its...mentioning
confidence: 99%