2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of ballistic performance of a two-layered structure of nanostructured metal and ceramic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10(b). As similarly observed by Guo et al [8], bilayered structure of ceramic/metal showed better ballistic performance because the ceramic eroded the bullet through cracking while the metal absorbed the remnant projectile kinetic energy by its deformation. Thus, the experimental results agree with the numerical simulation that predicted the wearing of the projectile by the ceramic, while the backing steel was ultimately protected.…”
Section: Composite: Laminate Of Alumina Ceramic and Armour Steelsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10(b). As similarly observed by Guo et al [8], bilayered structure of ceramic/metal showed better ballistic performance because the ceramic eroded the bullet through cracking while the metal absorbed the remnant projectile kinetic energy by its deformation. Thus, the experimental results agree with the numerical simulation that predicted the wearing of the projectile by the ceramic, while the backing steel was ultimately protected.…”
Section: Composite: Laminate Of Alumina Ceramic and Armour Steelsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, enhanced mobility, high strength to weight ratio with the high impact resistance are the primary concept of lightweight armour design [4]. Consequently, ceramic-steel composites have been introduced to offer the solution for efficient lightweight armours [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Precisely, low density, high hardness, high rigidity and compression strength of ceramics [1,5] makes it popular and suitable for armour systems; including aircraft structures, personal armour and military vehicles [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional composite protective structures mostly make use of ceramic and metal materials [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and mostly adopt a layered structure (monolithic ceramic as interlayer) or a two-dimensional frame-restraint structure (strip-shaped ceramics as interlayer) [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The traditional ceramic/metal composite structure tends to have stringent requirements on material performance, which renders poor flexibility in design [ 29 ]. Most of the existing studies focus on the layered structure of the whole ceramic, but the research on the anti-penetration performance of the ceramic composite structure with three-dimensional metal packaging is less.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest studies considered a polymermetal bilayer of polycarbonate and aluminium targets, impacted with conical projectiles [5]. This cost-effective approach is rooted in the notion of laminate-component studies, a topic of interest for impact applications since the 1970s, with most research focused on combinations of metal-metal [6][7][8], fibre-reinforced plastic-metal [9][10][11][12] and ceramic-metal [13][14][15][16] systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%