2017 United States National Committee of URSI National Radio Science Meeting (USNC-URSI NRSM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/usnc-ursi-nrsm.2017.7878304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of coil separation and angle effects on the mutual inductance for 13.56 MHz WRAP sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned on Figure 9, all three PSC pairs are in good agreement for k = 0.08 ± 0.003 at 16-mm distance. The result is in complete agreement with the simulation results with FEA tool, COMSOL (COMSOL Inc., Burlington, MA) [19]. To the best knowledge of the authors, there is no single accurate expression in the literature to calculate the coupling factor between two rectangular PSCs.…”
Section: Measuring the Coupling Factor (K)supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned on Figure 9, all three PSC pairs are in good agreement for k = 0.08 ± 0.003 at 16-mm distance. The result is in complete agreement with the simulation results with FEA tool, COMSOL (COMSOL Inc., Burlington, MA) [19]. To the best knowledge of the authors, there is no single accurate expression in the literature to calculate the coupling factor between two rectangular PSCs.…”
Section: Measuring the Coupling Factor (K)supporting
confidence: 80%
“…where L aid and L opp are the measured self-inductances in aiding and opposing connection of two coils, respectively. Figure 9 shows the measurements results by using Equation (19) and the measured self-inductances for three pairs of PSCs. As mentioned on Figure 9, all three PSC pairs are in good agreement for k = 0.08 ± 0.003 at 16-mm distance.…”
Section: Measuring the Coupling Factor (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 with respect to resistance can be addressed by utilising an inverse model of the non‐linearity curve. These are our current active research areas [19, 21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported coil design and optimisation for planar sprial coils through iterative algorithm [18]. We are also working on modelling effects of coil separation and orientation on mutual inductance [19, 20]. In case of physiological signals that depend on exact value, such as body temperature, differential measurement approach with a reference coil [21] or transformation from magnitude domain to temporal domain (e.g.…”
Section: Working Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal coupling can be achieved by making the diameter of the primary coil greater than the diameter of the sensor coil. The inductive link coupling coefficient is dependent on distance and alignment, such as lateral shift or the angular orientation of the secondary coil with respect to the primary, which was explored in our past study [26]. Our research group conducted an intensive study on an iterative method to find the optimal coil design which will therefore be left undiscussed in this context.…”
Section: Planar Wireless Coil Designmentioning
confidence: 99%