2020
DOI: 10.1002/nag.3168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of coupled multiphase flow and geomechanics in porous media with embedded discrete fractures

Abstract: In fractured natural formations, the equations governing fluid flow and geomechanics are strongly coupled. Hydrodynamical properties depend on the mechanical configuration, and they are therefore difficult to accurately resolve using uncoupled methods. In recent years, significant research has focused on discretization strategies for these coupled systems, particularly in the presence of complicated fracture network geometries. In this work, we explore a finitevolume discretization for the multiphase flow equa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expands on similar results for the single-phase case in [16]. Finally, we mention also the work of Cusini et al, which address numerical method for this coupled problem [17]. While they consider geometric complexity, they limit their discussion to quasi-static, small-strain kinematics.…”
Section: Introduction To Modeling and Analysis Of Fractured Porous Mediasupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This expands on similar results for the single-phase case in [16]. Finally, we mention also the work of Cusini et al, which address numerical method for this coupled problem [17]. While they consider geometric complexity, they limit their discussion to quasi-static, small-strain kinematics.…”
Section: Introduction To Modeling and Analysis Of Fractured Porous Mediasupporting
confidence: 61%
“…When dealing with stationary fractures-a fairly common scenario in rock mechanics applications-Equation (5) needs to be solved only once for obtaining an initial phase field that suitably represents the preexisting fractures. It is noted that such stationary fractures have also been well modeled by embedded discontinuity methods (e.g., [40][41][42] ). Compared with these methods, the phase-field method entails more computation time as it requires a quite fine discretization around the discontinuity.…”
Section: Phase-field Approximation and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 The XFEM enriches FE shape functions with discontinuous functions through the standard partition of unity method, 28 and therefore XFEM introduces new degrees of freedom into the global system to represent displacement jumps. The AES method enriches the strain tensor with the fracture-related discontinuous modes which may be statically condensed at the element level, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] so the method does not introduce additional enriched degrees of freedom in the implementation. Interested readers can refer to References 22 and 36 for more detailed information on the analyses and comparisons between the two types of enrichment methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%