2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20102971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Disturbance Recovery Based on MPC and Whole-Body Dynamics Control of Biped Walking

Abstract: Biped robots are similar to human beings and have broad application prospects in the fields of family service, disaster rescue and military affairs. However, simplified models and fixed center of mass (COM) used in previous research ignore the large-scale stability control ability implied by whole-body motion. The present paper proposed a two-level controller based on a simplified model and whole-body dynamics. In high level, a model predictive control (MPC) controller is implemented to improve zero moment poi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vertical direction, the oscillation magnitude increases with speed and is equal to about 2% of the body height [24]. Various methods have been proposed for control humanoid robots that focus on the CoM trajectory generation, such as the Predictive Control (MPC) Model [25,26], the minimized falling damage method which divided into two phases: (a). the optimal parametric strategy based on an inverted pendulum with flywheel used to plan the robot's motion, (b).…”
Section: Com (Center Of Mass) Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vertical direction, the oscillation magnitude increases with speed and is equal to about 2% of the body height [24]. Various methods have been proposed for control humanoid robots that focus on the CoM trajectory generation, such as the Predictive Control (MPC) Model [25,26], the minimized falling damage method which divided into two phases: (a). the optimal parametric strategy based on an inverted pendulum with flywheel used to plan the robot's motion, (b).…”
Section: Com (Center Of Mass) Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task goals consist of nine equations and the robot has only three actuated joints, that is, three unknown variables, which is obviously an over-constrained and occasionally conflicting problem. To achieve a real-time solution in each sampling interval (4 ms), we were inspired by the solution method for the robot’s walking pattern in [ 24 , 25 , 26 ] and unified the indispensable constraints and over-constrained goals into a framework based on QP optimization with different weights in front of each objective to embody the priority of the task goals. Therefore, the actuated angular acceleration in each sampling interval can be estimated and the input angles of the actuated joints can then be obtained through a simple iterative process.…”
Section: Simplified Jump Model and Main Scheme Of Jumpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this paper selects path tracking as the ultimate goal of autonomous vehicle lateral control, and the tracking accuracy as the main indicator to measure the performance of the control system. Model predictive control can be divided into linear time-varying model predictive control (LMPC) [26] and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) [27]. Compared with NMPC, the LMPC uses the linear predictive model and has better real-time performance, which is a very important character for the motion control of autonomous vehicles.…”
Section: Linearization Of Vehicle Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%