“…using a CFD‐DEM approach, as illustrated in Figure , where a correlation based on the ratio of collision to cohesion energy was able to describe differences in FPF according to differences in air inlet velocity, the Hamaker constant, and collision angle, which may be useful for guiding device design. Several other recent studies have provided insights on the influence of collisions on particle–particle momentum exchange, the relative difference in time required for API and carrier particles to leave the device, the influence of the Hamaker constant, the quality of a dry‐coating process based on certain parameters, and the influence of impact velocity, impact angle, and carrier rotation on the dispersion process …”